The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US
government to assert their victory in the space race over Russia, is
something which has grown in popularity over time.
Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe
that the U.S. has never landed on the moon. After the Apollo missions
ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the
term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after
Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky Dick to fake them to
put America in good standing in the Cold War.
In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to
suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA’s
explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.
10 - The Waving Flag
Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon
landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the
American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin
planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a
breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag.
The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s
atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.
Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this
phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in
a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled
before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by
the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which
is shown to shake in the video footage.
9 - Lack of Impact Crater
The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon,
there would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its
landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater
is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed there. The
surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t
seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.
Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact
crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the
module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions
than it would have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is
solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible anyway – in
the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches
down on a concrete airstrip.
8 - Multiple Light Sources
On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s
fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But
this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs
clearly show that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy
theorists suggest that this must mean multiple light sources are present
-suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set.
NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the strange shadows,
with subtle bumps and hills on the moon’s surface causing the
discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some
theorists; how could hills cause such large angular differences? In the
image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the
rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.
7 - The Van Allen Radiation Belt
In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is
known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by
Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The
Apollo missions to the moon marked the first ever attempts to transport
living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the
sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to
the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and
exterior of the spaceship.
NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of
time it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – meaning they received
only very small doses of radiation.
6 - The Unexplained Object
After photographs of the moon landings were released, theorists were
quick to notice a mysterious object (shown above) in the reflection of
an astronaut’s helmet from the Apollo 12 mission. The object appears to
be hanging from a rope or wire and has no reason to be there at all,
leading some to suggest it is an overhead spotlight typically found in
film studios.
The resemblance is questionable, given the poor quality of the
photograph, but the mystery remains as to why something is being
suspended in mid-air (or rather lack of air) on the moon. The lunar
module in other photos appears to have no extension from it that matches
the photo, so the object still remains totally unexplained.
5 - Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables
In order to support claims that the moon landings were shot in a
studio, conspiracy theorists had to account for the apparent low-gravity
conditions, which must have been mimicked by NASA. It has been
suggested that if you take the moon landing footage and increase the
speed of the film x2.5, the astronauts appear to be moving in Earth’s
gravity. As for the astronaut’s impressive jump height, which would be
impossible to perform in Earth’s gravity, hidden cables and wires have
been suggested as giving the astronauts some extra height. In some
screenshots outlines of alleged hidden cables can be seen (the
photograph above supposedly shows a wire, though it is extremely vague).
4 - Lack of Stars
One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack
of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds
on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter
than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.
The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map
out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled,
and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse
that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did
actually give).
Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars
are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars
from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.
3 - The “C” Rock
One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in
the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it.
The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is
unlikely to be a natural occurrence. It has been suggested that the rock
is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by an alleged film
crew. A set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way,
accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.
NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter, on the one hand
blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical
joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a
stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.
2 - The Layered Cross-hairs
The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a
multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are
imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however,
clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that
photographs may have been edited or doctored after being taken. The
photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are
shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in
one picture and the lunar rover in another.
Conspiracy theorists have suggested NASA printed the man-made objects
over a legitimate photograph of the moon to hoax the landings –
although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used
cross-hairs in the first place is a mystery.
1 - The Duplicate Backdrop
The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have
identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having
been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all
photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it
possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another? Well, if
you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA
simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their
moon landing videos.
NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth,
horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this,
to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is
incontrovertibly false.
Bonus
The Stanley Kubrick Theory
This loose extension of the popular conspiracy theory states that
acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick was approached by the US
government to hoax the first three moon landings. There are two main
branches of this somewhat implausible theory: one group of believers
maintain that Kubrick was approached after he released 2001: A Space
Odyssey (released in 1968, one year before the first moon landing),
after NASA came to appreciate the stunning realism of the film’s
outer-space scenes at that time; another group contends that Kubrick was
groomed by the government to film the moon landing long before this,
and that 2001: A Space Odyssey was a staged practice run for him.
So what evidence might support such claims? Well: apparently, if you
watch The Shining (another Kubrick picture), you can pick up on some
alleged messages hidden by Kubrick to subtly inform the world of his
part in the conspiracy. The most obvious is the child’s Apollo 11 shirt
worn in only one scene. Another supposed gem is the line written on Jack
Nicholson’s character’s typewriter: “All work and no play makes Jack a
dull boy”, in which the word “all” can be interpreted as A11, or Apollo
11.
If you aren’t convinced yet, Kubrick made the mysterious hotel room
in the film number 237. Guess how many miles it is from here to the
moon: 238,000. So divide that by a thousand and minus one, and you’ve
got one airtight theory right there.
